[Arp] Passing data to commands

[Aral Balkan]

Hi Christophe,

Actually, you know what -- you're right. It's also clearer in intent 
when you have named properties. OK, so unless we have any objections, a 
data object it is. :)

Aral

Christophe Herreman wrote:

>Hi Aral,
>
>  
>
>>How about making it more flexible? Event ( type, target, arg1, arg2,
>>    
>>
>argN )?
>
>Wouldn't the arg values make it messy to work with the Event object?
>I personally don't like that approach (ok, very subjective) and would much
>rather create and object as 3th parameter where I can use name-value pairs
>for the vars I'm passing.
>
>Just a thought.
>