[Arp] Passing data to commands
aral at ariaware.com
Mon Jan 10 10:42:05 PST 2005
Actually, you know what -- you're right. It's also clearer in intent
when you have named properties. OK, so unless we have any objections, a
data object it is. :)
Christophe Herreman wrote:
>>How about making it more flexible? Event ( type, target, arg1, arg2,
>Wouldn't the arg values make it messy to work with the Event object?
>I personally don't like that approach (ok, very subjective) and would much
>rather create and object as 3th parameter where I can use name-value pairs
>for the vars I'm passing.
>Just a thought.
More information about the Arp